alors que le vaccin est loin d être efficace

Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. Unlike certain gene therapies that irreversibly alter cell DNA and could act as a source of side effects, mRNA-based medicines are designed to not irreversibly change cell DNA; however, side effects observed in gene therapy could negatively impact the perception of mRNA medicines despite the differences in mechanism. In addition, because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for approval is uncertain. The number and design of the clinical trials and preclinical studies required for the approval of these types of medicines have not been established, may be different from those required for gene therapy products, or may require safety testing like gene therapy products. Moreover, the length of time necessary to complete clinical trials and to submit an application for marketing approval for a final decision by a regulatory authority varies significantly from one pharmaceutical product to the next, and may be difficult to predict.

Ca fait plusieurs fois que je lis ça. Pourquoi faut-il absolument appeler les vaccins covid des "traitements", ou vice-versa, si ce sont des traitements, pourquoi s'évertuer à appeler ça des vaccins ?

@franceinfo - il y a 13h
Covid-19 : "Nous ne nous dirigeons pas vers un confinement", confirme Olivier Véran